Abstract. The article considers the problems of criminal-legal assessment of the constituent elements of the crime provided for in Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. In recent years, issues related to the criminal-legal assessment of the elements of the said act have become more actively on the agenda of the law en-forcement and judicial systems. In particular, dozens of cases of conviction under this norm (guilty verdicts) over the past 5 years are already known, that is, the number is comparable to the period 1997 - 2019. The key issue in the qualification of the crime provided for in Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation is a detailed analysis of the elements of the objective side, which should include the following: an act in the form of obstructing the legitimate professional activities of journalists; a method in the form of forcing journalists to disseminate information; a method in the form of forcing journalists to refuse to disseminate information. Each of the given objective el-ements of the analyzed crime is subject to scientifically substantiated and practice-oriented study, since there are no relevant explanations from the highest judicial au-thority for this category of cases. Special attention is paid to the issues of correlation between the scope of federal legislation on mass media and provisions of the criminal law on protection of obstruction of journalistic activity. The author shows the under-standing of the direct object of this crime, which follows from the content of the crimi-nal law prohibition, and also identifies the limits of interpretation of objective features, including the act and the method. The peculiarity in the regulation of the method of co-ercion of a journalist is substantiated and demonstrated as not having a precise legisla-tive prescription, since in the context of the traditions of normative regulation, a specif-ic method in the disposition of a criminal law norm is indicated by an open or closed list, as, for example, in Art. 133 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation or Art. 150 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The author discusses the appro-priateness of such analogies in the interpretation of the provisions of Art. 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation for the purposes of correct and scientifically substantiated qualification. Based on the arguments presented, the author makes a number of conclusions that allow making a general conclusion about the limits of the repressive impact of Art. 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation.
qualification of crimes, journalistic activity, privacy, constitutional law, criminal law, freedom of information, personal inviolability
1. Karabanova, E.N., Cepelev, K.V. K voprosu o perspektive ispol'zovaniya administrativnoj preyudicii v ugolovnom prave Rossii [On the Prospects of Using Administrative Prejudice in Russian Criminal Law]. Rossijskaya yusticiya. - Russian Justice. 2020. № 11. Pp. 57-60. (in Russian).
2. Krasil'nikova, E.V. Vosprepyatstvovanie zakonnoj professional'noj deyatel'nosti zhurnalistov (st. 144 UK RF): voprosy zakonodatel'noj tekhniki i differenciacii otvetstvennosti : avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Obstruction of the Lawful Professional Activities of Journalists (Article 144 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation): Issues of Legislative Technique and Differentiation of Responsibility. Kazan', 2007. 28 p. (in Russian).
3. Karimova, YU.V. Opredelenie ob"ekta vosprepyatstvovaniya zakonnoj professional'noj deyatel'nosti zhurnalistov [Definition of the Object of Obstruction of the Lawful Professional Activities of Journalists]. Aktual'nye problemy rossijskogo prava - Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2018. № 6. Pp. 126-133. (in Russian).
4. Ugolovnoe pravo Rossijskoj Federacii. Osobennaya chast' : uchebnik [Criminal Law of the Russian Federation. Special Part: Textbook] / pod red. L.V. Inogamovoj-Hegaj, A.I. Raroga, A.I. CHuchaeva. 2-e izd., ispr. i dop. M. : KONTRAKT, INFRA-M, 2009. 800 p. (in Russian).
5. Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii: v 4 t. (postatejnyj) T. 2: Osobennaya chast' / otv. red. V.M. Lebedev [Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: in 4 volumes (article-by-article) Volume 2: Special Part / ed. V.M. Lebedev.]. Moscow : YUrajt, 2017. 371 p. (in Russian).
6. Degterev, A.A. Vosprepyatstvovanie zakonnoj professional'noj deyatel'nosti zhurnalistov: ob"ektivnaya i sub"ektivnaya storony i voprosy kvalifikacii [Obstruction of the lawful professional activities of journalists: objective and subjective aspects and qualification issues. Rossijskij sledovatel'. – Russian investigator. 2022. № 12. Pp. 26-31. (in Russian).
7. Kommentarij k Ugolovnomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federacii: nauchno-prakticheskij (postatejnyj) / pod red. S.V. D'yakova, N.G. Kadnikova. 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M. : YUrisprudenciya [Commentary on the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation: scientific and practical (article-by-article) / edited by S.V. Dyakova, N.G. Kadnikova. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged], 2013. 912 p. (in Russian).
8. Novikov, V.A. Vosprepyatstvovanie zakonnoj professional'noj deyatel'nosti zhurnalistov [Obstruction of the lawful professional activities of journalists]. Zakonnost' - Legality. 2012. № 11. Pp. 30-32. (in Russian).
