employee from 01.01.2014 until now
Putilin Belgorod Law Institute of Ministry of the Interior of Russia
employee
Belgorod, Belgorod, Russian Federation
Introduction. In the article the author examines the provisions of the Russian legislation regulating the prohibition of propaganda-related demonstration of Nazi attributes or symbols or attributes or symbols similar to Nazi attributes or symbols to the extent of confusion. The author draws attention to the lack of legal regulation and the existing gaps in legislation, which involve the adoption of controversial decisions by the law enforcement officer. Materials and Methods. The regulatory framework for the study was made up of laws, regulations of the Government of the Russian Federation and executive authorities of the Russian Federation. The study used general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, historical), special scientific (comparative legal) and special (formal legal) methods. The Results of the Study. Analyzing the provisions of Article 6 of Federal Law 80-FZ, dated 19 May 1995, “On Perpetuating the Victory of the Soviet People in the Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945”, the author emphasizes the defects of legal norms prohibiting the demonstration of Nazi attributes or symbols. According to the author, these defects are due to the lack of a legal definition of such concepts as “Nazism” and “fascism” in domestic legislation, insufficient elaboration of the regulatory consolidation of the list of objects classified as Nazi and fascist attributes and symbols. Furthermore, the author proposes making legislative changes in this Federal Law and Resolution No. 574, issued by the Government of the Russian Federation on June 11, 2015, in order to clarify the rules for forming the list of organizations specified in parts three and four of Article 6 in the named law, as well as the attributes and symbols of these organizations. This is necessary for inclusion those organizations (groups) in the list that are recognized as criminal by the Convict of the Nuremberg Tribunal, but are not currently listed in parts 3 and 4 of Article 6 in the Law under consideration. Findings and Conclusions. The proposed improvements, from the author's point of view, will increase the effectiveness of struggle against extremism expressed in propaganda and public demonstration of Nazi attributes or symbols or attributes or symbols similar to Nazi attributes or symbols to the extent of confusion.
fascism, Nazism, attributes, symbolics, demonstration of Nazi attributes and symbols
1. Galyashina E.I., Podkatilina M.L. Otvetstvennost' za demonstraciyu nacistskoj atributiki ili simvoliki libo oboznachenij, skhodnyh s nimi do stepeni smesheniya // Lex Russica. - 2012. - Tom 71. - S. 766-773.
2. Poshelov P.V. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy stat'i 20.3 KoAP RF // Administrativnoe pravo i process. - 2017. - № 7. - S. 73-76.
3. Rydchenko K.D. Nekotorye osobennosti obespecheniya zapreta propagandy i publichnogo demonstrirovaniya nacistskoj atributiki i simvoliki // Vestnik Voronezhskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2009. - № 2. - S. 60-65.
4. Sal'nikov E.V. Rekonstrukciya istoricheskih sobytij pri provedenii kul'turno-massovyh meropriyatij v svete zapreta na publichnuyu demonstraciyu nacistskoj atributiki ili simvoliki // Kul'tura: upravlenie, ekonomika, pravo. - 2015. - № 1. S. 19-23.
5. Senchihin S.P. O znachenii yuridicheskoj tekhniki pri konstruirovanii antiekstremistskih administrativnyh sostavov pravonarushenij // Rossijskaya yusticiya. - 2020. - № 9. - S. 42-43.
6. Poshelov P.V. Osobennosti pravoprimeneniya po delam o pravonarusheniyah ekstremistskoj napravlennosti // Administrativnoe pravo i process. - 2021. - № 12. - C. 54-57.
7. Nagornyj N.N. Evolyuciya administrativno-pravovogo regulirovaniya v sfere otvetstvennosti za propagandunacistskoj i ekstremistskoj simvoliki / Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupnost'yu: voprosy teorii i praktiki: materialy XXV mezhdunarodnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii. CHast' 1. - Krasnoyarsk, 2022. S. 54-56.
8. Kiknadze V.G., Ilievskij N.V. CHto takoe fashizm, nacizm i neonacizm? Genezis fashizma, mekhanizmy ego vliyaniya na massy, vzaimosvyazi s nacizmom i totalitarizmom: teoriya, istoriya i sovremennost' // Nauka. Obshchestvo. Oborona. - 2023. - T. 11. - № 1(34). - S. 1-1. - DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2311-1763-2023-1-1-1.
9. Sheveleva K.V. O normativno-pravovom zakreplenii ponyatij «nacizm» i fashizm v otechestvennom zakonodatel'stve // Vestnik Akademii prava i upravleniya. - 2021. - № 2. - S. 78-83.
10. Kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah. Glavy 19-23. Postatejnyj nauchno-prakticheskij kommentarij / V.V. Gushchin, V.V. Denisenko, A.V. Martynov [i dr.]; pod obshch. red. B.V. Rossinskogo. - Moskva: Bibliotechka «Rossijskoj gazety», 2014. Vyp. XI-XII. - 592 s.
11. Derevyanskaya T.P., Yushina Yu.V., Rudik M.V. K voprosu o stepeni obshchestvennoj opasnosti propagandy ili demonstrirovaniya nacistskoj (fashistskoj) simvoliki libo atributiki //Evrazijskij yuriicheskij zhurnal. - 2019. - № 2. - S. 151-152.
12. Nyurnbergskij process: sbornik materialov. T. 2 / Sost. G.N. Aleksandrov, D.S. Karev, M.Yu. Raginskij. - Moskva: Gosyurizdat, 1955. - 1156 s.
