Ulan-Ude
UDK 343.9 Криминология. Криминалистика
GRNTI 10.00 ГОСУДАРСТВО И ПРАВО. ЮРИДИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ
OKSO 40.00.00 Юриспруденция
BBK 67 Право. Юридические науки
TBK 8 ГУМАНИТАРНЫЕ НАУКИ. РЕЛИГИЯ. ИСКУССТВО
BISAC LAW LAW
The study of the legislation of other states plays an important role in ensuring effective cooperation between countries, development of scientific research, providing citizens traveling to the territory of a foreign country and staying there with recommendations on the rules to be followed in order not to be held legally liable. Russia maintains long-standing friendly relations with Mongolia, but to date, Russian publications have either not considered the rights and obligations of a person with the status of a victim in this country at all, or have only focused on the level of separate fragments of scientific publications. Objective: to review the rights and duties of the victim enshrined in the Criminal Procedure Code of Mongolia. Methods: universal dialectical method of scientific cognition, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, analogy, comparative legal method. Results: on the basis of using the mentioned methods it was established that both Mongolian and Russian criminal procedure codes, in the part regulating the participation of the victim have many common features, but there are also differences. Thus, in the Codes not enough attention is paid to regulation of rights and duties of victims of legal entities, provision of victims of physical persons with free qualified legal assistance, protection of rights and legitimate interests of these subjects in the process of proving, provision of compensation of damage caused by criminal encroachments.
criminal procedural legislation, victim, Mongolia, rights and duties of victims, Code of Criminal Procedure, comparativism
1. Saidov A.H. Comparative jurisprudence (basic legal systems of modernity): Textbook / A.H. Saidov / Edited by V. A. Tumanov. – Moscow : Jurist, 2003. – 448 p.
2. Ansel M. Methodological problems of comparative law / M. Ansel // Essays of comparative law : A collection. – Moscow : Progress, 1981. – pp.36-86.
3. Lafitskiy V. Comparative jurisprudence in the images of law. – Moscow : Statute, 2010. – 429 p.
4. Engibaryan R.V. Comparative constitutional law / R.V. Engibaryan. – Moscow : Jurist, 2005. – 429 p.
5. Lushnikov A.M. International and comparative labor law and social security law. Introduction to the course: textbook / M.V. Lushnikova, A.M. Lushnikov. – Moscow : Yurlitinform, 2011. – 304 p.
6. Malinovsky A.A. Comparative jurisprudence in the field of criminal law: monograph / A.A. Malinovsky. – Moscow : International Relations, 2002. – 376 p.
7. Nemytina M.V. Possibilities of adaptation of foreign and domestic experience in Russian law / M.V. Nemytina // Zhidkov readings "Methodological problems of comparative jurisprudence" : materials of the All-Russian Scientific Conference, Moscow, March 27, 2009 – Moscow: RUDN. – 2009.
8. Marchenko M.N. Comparative Jurisprudence: the general part. Textbook for law schools / M.N. Marchenko. – Moscow: Zertsalo, 2001. – 560 p.
9. Popova, E. I. Specifics of explaining the procedure for compensation of damage to Mongolian citizens who suffered from criminal theft in the territory of the Russian Federation / E. I. Popova // A Russian investigator. - 2017. – No. 21. – pp. 49-52.
