Omsk, Russian Federation
The article is devoted to the study of problems related to the formation of grounds for the application of criminal procedural security measures. In the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, the legislator provided for a wide range of means of protection against post-criminal impact. However, legal regulation has shortcomings in the normative description of the grounds for the implementation of criminal procedural security measures. Along with this, such measures limit the constitutional rights of participants in criminal proceedings on the part of the defense. Especially when it comes to the means of protection against post-criminal impact associated with the concealment of information about the person. In this regard, the limits of establishing the grounds for the implementation of a security measure by the investigator are considered, the nature of the information necessary for the reasonable use of such a measure is determined.
protection, security measures, post-criminal impact, grounds, investigator
1. Zajcev O.A. K voprosu o primenenii ugolovno-processual`ny`x mer bezopasnosti [On the issue of applying criminal procedural security measures]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii − Vestnik of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2012, no. 2, pp. 37-38.
2. Epixin A.Yu. Obshhie usloviya e`ffektivnosti funkcionirovaniya bezopasnosti lichnosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [General conditions for the effectiveness of the functioning of personal security in criminal proceedings]. Ugolovnoe parvo − Criminal law. 2003, no. 4, pp. 68-70.
3. Voronov D.A. Mery` ugolovno-processual`nogo prinuzhdeniya kak sredstva obespecheniya bezopasnosti uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva avtoref… kand. yurid. nauk [Measures of criminal procedural coercion as a means of ensuring the safety of participants in criminal proceedings abstract of... Ph.D. legal Sci.]. Omsk, 2008, 22 p.
4. Sluchevskij V. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo processa. [Textbook of Russian criminal procedure]. St. Petersburg, 1919, 684 p.
5. Kajgorodov A.A. Neposredstvennost` i ustnost` sudebnogo razbiratel`stva [Immediacy and orality of judicial proceedings]. Rossijskoe pravosudie − Russian justice. 2010, no. 8 (52), pp. 84-88.
6. Serzhantova L.A., Svechnikova E.I. Osobennosti soxraneniya danny`x o lichnosti na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela [Features of preserving personal data at the stage of initiating a criminal case]. Yuridicheskij Vestnik Samarskogo universiteta − Legal Vestnik of Samara University. 2020, no. 6 (2), pp. 86-89.
7. Ustinov D.S. Osobennosti obespecheniya prava obvinyaemogo na zashhitu pri realizacii mer bezopasnosti v otnoshenii uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Features of ensuring the right of the accused to defense when implementing security measures in relation to participants in criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj yuridicheskoj akademii − Vestnik of the Saratov State Legal Academy. 2022, no. 4 (147), pp. 126-133.
8. Shapovalova T., Bondar E. Sootnoshenie dostovernosti i dopustimosti dokazatel`stv v ugolovnom processe [The relationship between the reliability and admissibility of evidence in criminal proceedings]. Ugolovnoe pravo − Criminal law. 2007, no. 6, pp. 97-101.
9. Kapustina L.K. Sootnoshenie dopustimosti i dostovernosti dokazatel`stv v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve [The relationship between the admissibility and reliability of evidence in criminal proceedings]. Vestnik Kazanskogo yuridicheskogo instituta MVD Rossii − Vestnik of the Kazan Legal Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2019, no. 3, pp. 386-390.
10. Brusnicyn L.V. Primenenie norm UPK RF, obespechivayushhix bezopasnost` uchastnikov ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva [Application of the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, ensuring the safety of participants in criminal proceedings]. Moscow, 2013, 152 p.
