Russian Federation
UDK 343.98 Криминалистика. Криминалистическая техника и тактика
Introduction: The article discusses the various forms of evaluation of the expert opinion; analyzes the different types of procedural forms of evaluation of the expert opinion indicating shortcomings in the theory and practice of procedural evaluation; describes in detail the types of non-procedural evaluation of the expert opinion, characterizes, offers their classification; special attention is paid to the purpose and conditions of reviewing, shows the need to comply with these conditions in order to achieve a high degree of objectivity of reviewing; the importance of reviewing the expert's conclusion as one of the effective types of non-procedural assessment in forensic activities and in legal proceedings as a whole is shown. Materials and methods: The normative basis of the study is formed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, criminal and criminal procedural legislation, local regulations governing the conduct of forensic examinations, as well as formulating the main provisions of the expert opinion assessment. The methodological basis of the study was the General dialectical method of scientific knowledge, which is universal, as well as methods of logical deduction, induction, cognitive methods and techniques of observation, comparison, analysis, generalization and description. Results: Allowed to identify some problems of legislative regulation of the procedural assessment of the expert opinion, to reveal the content of various forms of evaluation of the expert opinion, as well as the need for understanding by the investigator in the procedural assessment of the expert opinion of the logical justification of the results of the expert study. Conclusions and conclusions: The analyzed approaches, the recommendations of the expert opinion assessment allow to increase the level of logical justification and objective assessment of the conclusions in the expert opinion, which will improve the quality of the expert opinion assessment.
forensic examination, forensic expert activity, special knowledge, specialist, expert, internal conviction of the expert
1. Vardanyan A.V., Gribunov O.P. Sovremennaya doktrina metodiko-kriminalisticheskogo obespecheniya rassledovaniya otdel'nyh vidov prestupleniy // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2017. - № 2 (81). - S. 23-34.
2. Aminev F.G. Sudebno-ekspertnaya deyatel'nost' v Rossiyskoy Federacii: sovremennye problemy i puti ih resheniya: dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk. - Rostov n/D., 2016. - 482 s.
3. Kiselevich I.V. K voprosu ob ocenke zaklyucheniya eksperta // Kriminalisticheskoe obespechenie raskrytiya i rassledovaniya prestupleniy: materialy vseros. nauch.-prakt. kruglogo stola. - Ch. 1. - Stavropol': SF KrU MVD RF, 2016. - S. 173-178.
4. Sorokotyagin I.N., Sorokotyagina D.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza: uchebnik i praktikum dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata. - M.: Yurayt, 2015. - 288 s.
5. Shlyahov A.R. Trudy po sudebnoy ekspertize. - M.: Nauka, 2006. -
6. 567 s.
7. Orlov Yu.K. Sovremennye problemy dokazyvaniya i ispol'zovaniya special'nyh znaniy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nauchno-uchebnoe posobie. - M.: Prospekt, 2016. - 208 s.
8. Rossinskaya, E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. Teoriya sudebnoy ekspertizy (sudebnaya ekspertologiya): uchebnik / pod red. E.R. Rossinskoy. - M.: Norma; INFRA-M, 2016. - 368 s.
9. Korzh V.P. Processual'naya i kriminalisticheskaya ocenka zaklyucheniya eksperta // Aktual'nye problemy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti v ugolovnom, grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom processe i po delam ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah: materialy VII mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf. - Ufa, 2018. - S. 92-96.
10. Moiseeva T.F. Osnovy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti: konspekt lekciy. - M.: RGUP, 2016. - 190 s.
11. Aminev F.G. O sovremennom ponyatiynom apparate sudebnoy ekspertologii // Vestnik Vostochno-Sibirskogo instituta MVD Rossii. - 2017. - № 4. - S. 143-149.
12. Belkin A.R. UPK RF: konstruktivnaya kritika i vozmozhnye uluchsheniya. Ch. 10: Proizvodstvo sudebnoy ekspertizy. - M.: RTU (MIREA), 2016. - 416 s.
13. Lokshina S.M. Kratkiy slovar' inostrannyh slov. - M.: Rus. yaz., 1999. - 352 s.
14. Aminev F.G. O znachenii recenzirovaniya v sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti // Kriminalistika kak nauka i uchebnaya disciplina: istoriya nastoyaschee i perspektivy razvitiya: materialy mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., posvyasch. 35-letiyu kafedry kriminalistiki Instituta prava BashGU. - Ufa: RIC BashGU, 2017. - S. 7-12.
15. Vardanyan A.V., Gribunov O. P. The Modern doctrine of the methodical-criminal maintenance of investigation of certain types of crimes // Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of MIA of Russia. - 2017. - № 2 (81). P. 23-34.
16. Aminev F. G. Forensic activities in the Russian Federation: modern problems and their solutions: dis.. d-RA yurid. sciences'. - Rostov on-don, 2016. - 482 p.
17. Kiselevich I. V. To a question of an assessment of the conclusion of the expert // Forensic support of disclosure and investigation of crimes: materials of the all-Russian scientific and practical round table. - Part 1. - Stavropol: SF Crewe of the Ministry of interior of the Russian Federation, 2016. - P. 173-178.
18. Sorokotyagin I. N., Sorokotyagina D. A. forensics: tutorial and workshop for academic bachelor degree. - M.: Yurayt, 2015. - 288 p.
19. Shlyakhov A. R. Works on forensics / A. R. Shlyakhov; GOS. institution Russian Federal center of forensic expertise under Ministry of justice. - M.: Science, 2006. (Forensic library). - 567 p.
20. Orlov Yu. K. Modern problems of proof and use of special knowledge in criminal shipbuilding: scientific and educational manual. - M.: Prospect, 2016. - 208 p.
21. Rossinskaya E. R., Galyashina E. I.,. Zinin, A. M. the Theory of judicial review (Judicial expertology) : the textbook / under the editorship of E. R. Rossinskaya. - M.: Norma, INFRA-M, 2016. - 368 p.
22. Korzh V. P. Procedural and criminalistic assessment of the expert opinion / Actual problems of forensic expert activity in criminal, civil, arbitration proceedings and cases of administrative offenses: proceedings of the VII International scientific-practical conference. - Ufa, 9 November 2018. - P. 92-96.
23. Moiseeva T.F. Fundamentals of forensic activities: lecture notes. - M.: rgup, 2016. - 190 p.
24. Aminev F.G. On the modern conceptual apparatus of forensic expertise / / Bulletin of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of internal Affairs of Russia. - 2017. - No. 4. - P. 143-149.
25. Belkin A.R. Code of criminal procedure: constructive criticism and possible improvements. Part X. Production of forensic examination. - M.: RTU (MIREA), 2016. - 416 p.
26. Lokshin S.M. Concise dictionary of foreign words. - M.: Rus. yaz., 1999. - 352 p.
27. Aminev F.G. On the importance of peer review in forensic science / / Criminalistics as a science and educational discipline: the history of the present and prospects of development: materials of the International scientific and practical conference dedicated to the 35th anniversary of the Department of criminology of the Institute of law of Bassu (Ufa, September 28-29, 2017). - Ufa: RITS Bashgu, 2017. - P. 7-12.
