ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE FOR REPEATED COMMISSION OF PETTY THEFT

Kulakov N A; Savelyeva M V; Antonov V A

doi:doi:

Home / Journals / Vestnik of the East Siberian institute of the Ministry of internal affairs of the Russian Federation / Issue 4 / ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE FOR REPEATED COMMISSION OF PETTY THEFT

ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE FOR REPEATED COMMISSION OF PETTY THEFT

Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text

To cite

Citations:

ADMINISTRATIVE PREJUDICE FOR REPEATED COMMISSION OF PETTY THEFT

Journal: VESTNIK OF THE EAST SIBERIAN INSTITUTE OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERNAL AFFAIRS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION № 4 , 2017

Rubrics: BURNING ISSUES OF CRIMINAL LAW, CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND FORENSIC MEASURES FOR COMBATING CRIME

VAC 5.1.1 Теоретико-исторические правовые науки

Kulakov N A ¹

Savelyeva M V ²

Antonov V A ³

Author and publication information

Authors:

1. St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

2. St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation

3. East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

Type:

Article

Pages:

from 106 to 110

Status:

Published

Received:

15.12.2017

Accepted:

15.12.2017

Published:

25.12.2017

Subject area:

VAC 5.1.1 Теоретико-исторические правовые науки

Language:

Russian

Keywords:

administrative prejudice, petty theft, theft, decriminalization of the Criminal code, protection of property, balance public and private interests, a high degree of responsibility

Abstract and keywords

Abstract (English):
This article is devoted to possibilities of effective protection of property and the application of administrative responsibility for the theft. The article also contains information about the administrative prejudice, as a responsibility measure used for the repeated commission of an administrative offense.

Keywords:
administrative prejudice, petty theft, theft, decriminalization of the Criminal code, protection of property, balance public and private interests, a high degree of responsibility

Text

Text (PDF): Read Download

References

1. Alekseev S.S. Pravo sobstvennosti. Problemy teorii / 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: Norma, 2007. 240 s.

2. Boyko A.I. Administrativnaya preyudiciya: za i protiv // Yurist-Pravoved. Rostov n/D.: Izd-vo Rost. yurid. in-ta MVD Rossii, 2004. № 3. S. 27-32.

3. Informacionnyy pravovoy portal «Gosudarstvennaya Duma Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federacii». ULR: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=9533696&02 (data obrascheniya 17.05.2016).

4. Kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii ob administrativnyh pravonarusheniyah ot 30.12.2001 № 195-FZ // Ros. gaz. 2001. № 256. 31 dek. (s izm. i dopol. v red. ot 29.07.2017).

5. Komanchi V.A. Ugolovno-pravovye sredstva resheniya ekonomicheskih problem v usloviyah reform: principial'nye vozmozhnosti, napravleniya ispol'zovaniya i prakticheskie rezul'taty: avtoref. dis.. kand. yurid. nauk. N. Novgorod: NA MVD Rossii, 2001. 281 s.

6. Poyasnitel'naya zapiska k proektu federal'nogo zakona «O vnesenii izmeneniy v Ugolovnyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii i Ugolovno-processual'nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federacii po voprosam sovershenstvovaniya osnovaniy i poryadka osvobozhdeniya ot ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti» Informacionnyy pravovoy portal «Gosudarstvennaya Duma Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiyskoy Federacii». ULR: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/main.nsf/%28SpravkaNew%29?OpenAgent&RN=9533696&02 (data obrascheniya 17.05.2017).

7. Prohorcev I.A. Voprosy primeneniya stat'i 7.27 KoAP RF // Yuridicheskiy mir. 2009. № 9. S. 46-50.

8. Savel'eva M.V. K voprosu o sorazmernosti administrativnoy i ugolovnoy otvetstvennosti za hischenie // Ugolovnoe zakonodatel'stvo: vchera, segodnya, zavtra (pamyati professora S.F. Kravcova): materialy ezhegodnoy vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. 2016. S. 114-116.

Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text

To cite

Citations:

Confirmation

Регистрация