Submit manuscript
Home / Journals / Vestnik of the East Siberian institute of the Ministry of internal affairs of the Russian Federation / Issue 3 / MODERN PRACTICE OF APPOINTMENT AND PRODUCTION OF JUDICIAL EXPERTISE AT THE STAGE OF EXCITATION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE
MODERN PRACTICE OF APPOINTMENT AND PRODUCTION OF JUDICIAL EXPERTISE AT THE STAGE OF EXCITATION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE
Submit manuscript Download PDF
Text
To cite
Citations:

MODERN PRACTICE OF APPOINTMENT AND PRODUCTION OF JUDICIAL EXPERTISE AT THE STAGE OF EXCITATION OF THE CRIMINAL CASE
VAC 5.1.1 Теоретико-исторические правовые науки
Nikonovich S L 1
Shaevich A A 2
Trubkina O V 3
Authors:
1.  Lipetsk Institute of Law and Economy

2.  East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia

3.  East-Siberian Institute of the Ministry of the Interior of Russia

Type:
Article
Pages:
from 96 to 103
Status:
Published
Received:
15.09.2017
Accepted:
15.09.2017
Published:
25.09.2017
Subject area:
VAC 5.1.1 Теоретико-исторические правовые науки
Language:
Russian
Keywords:
the use of special knowledge, pre-investigation verification, preliminary investigation, the appointment of expertise, the production of expertise, the institution of criminal proceedings, the use of special knowledge
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
In the article the problems arising in practical activity connected with the order of appointment and production of examinations at the stage of criminal case initiation, caused by changes introduced by Federal Law No. 23-FZ of March 4, 2013, are considered. Some aspects of forensic activity at the stage of preliminary investigation are touched upon, practice of appointment and production of examinations and preliminary studies are analyzed.

Keywords:
the use of special knowledge, pre-investigation verification, preliminary investigation, the appointment of expertise, the production of expertise, the institution of criminal proceedings, the use of special knowledge
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Ashurov V.K. Praktika naznacheniya sudebnoy ekspertizy na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Sudebnaya ekspertiza. 2013. № 3 (35). S. 19-25.

2. Baev M.O. Zametki ob ocherednyh izmeneniyah Ugolovno-processual'-nogo kodeksa RF (o novellah Federal'nogo zakona № 23-FZ ot 4 marta 2013 g.) // Sudebnaya vlast' i ugolovnyy process. 2013. № 2. S. 41-49.

3. Zayceva E.A. Novaya praktika naznacheniya i proizvodstva sudebnyh ekspertiz na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2013. № 4-2. S. 63-69.

4. Kravcova S.V. Proizvodstvo sudebnyh ekspertiz na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela // Aktual'nye problemy bor'by s prestupleniyami i inymi pravonarusheniyami. 2013. № 11-1. S. 152-153.

5. Sinenko S.A. O novyh pravah poterpevshego na stadii vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v svyazi s naznacheniem i proizvodstvom ekspertizy // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 7. S. 67-70.

6. Tarasov A.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza do vozbuzhdeniya ugolovnogo dela v kontekste Federal'nogo zakona «O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti» // Evraziyskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. 2014. № 1 (68). S. 125-127.

7. Vardanyan A.V., Mirzoyan S.S. Obschie polozheniya sudebnoy stroitel'no-tehnicheskoy ekspertizy v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Filosofiya prava. 2014. № 4 (65). S. 44-47.

8. Semencov V.A. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: nekotorye sovremennye problemy // Vestnik Volgogradskoy akademii MVD Rossii. 2014. № 4 (31). S. 114-121.

9. O gosudarstvennoy sudebno-ekspertnoy deyatel'nosti v Rossiyskoy Federacii: feder. zakon ot 31.05. 2001 № 73-FZ (red. ot 25.11.2013 № 317-FZ) // SZ RF. 2001. № 23. St. 2291; St. 9.

10. Vardanyan A.V., Ovsepyan G.M. Sudebnye ekspertizy po ugolovnym delam o prestupleniyah, svyazannyh s narusheniem trebovaniy pozharnoy bezopasnosti: taktiko-kriminalisticheskiy potencial, problemy naznacheniya i proizvodstva // Filosofiya prava. 2015. № 1 (68). S. 67-70.

11. Danilova I.A. Processual'nye i takticheskie osobennosti ispol'zovaniya special'nyh znaniy (proizvodstvo ekspertizy i dopros eksperta) / I.A. Danilova, S.P. Kushnirenko, T.G. Nikolaeva // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2006. № 2 (30). S. 255-259.

12. Po special'no razrabotannoy ankete bylo oprosheno 154 sotrudnika organov vnutrennih del, nahodivshihsya na kursah povysheniya kvalifikacii v Vostochno-Sibirskom institute MVD Rossii za 2016-2017 uchebnyy god.

13. Vardanyan A.V. Nekotorye problemy naznacheniya psihologo-psihiat-richeskoy ekspertizy pri rassledovanii nasil'stvennyh posyagatel'stv na zhizn' i zdorov'e lichnosti, sovershennyh sub'ektami, imeyuschimi psihicheskie rasstroystva, ne isklyuchayuschie vmenyaemosti // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki. 2014. № 2-2. S. 168-172.

14. Apellyacionnoe opredelenie № 22-440/2016 ot 19 yanvarya 2016 g. po delu № 22-440/2016. URL: http://sudact.ru/ regular/doc/EHT6Efefl16x/ (data obrascheniya 01.03.2016).

15. Nikonovich S.L. Osobennosti primeneniya special'nyh znaniy pri rassledovanii prestupleniy, sovershaemyh v sfere nezakonnogo oborota dragocennyh metallov i dragocennyh kamney // Vestnik kriminalistiki. 2011. № 4 (40). S. 65-71.

16. Nikonovich S.L. Nezakonnyy oborot dragocennyh metallov i kamney: teoriya i praktika rassledovaniya: monografiya. M.: Yuniti-Dana, Zakon i pravo, 2011. 280 s.

© esiirk.editorum.ru
Support Powered by Editorum,  Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot password?