Both in practical activities, and in the theory there is no unity in understanding what exactly leads to inadmissibility of proofs: mistakes or breaches of criminally-remedial law at their collecting, verification and valuation of evidence[**].
1. Ozhegov S.I. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: 70000 slov / Pod red. N.Yu. Shvedovoy. 23-e izd., ispr. M.: Russkiy yazyk, 1991. S. 390, 486.
2. Chervotkin A.S. Apellyaciya i kassaciya: Posobie dlya sudey. M.: Prospekt, 2010. S. 24, 25, 46.
3. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda RF ot 2 fevralya 1996 g. № 4-P «Po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti p. 5 ch. 2 st. 371 UPK RSFSR, ch. 3 st. 374 i p. 4 ch. 2 st. 384 UPK RSFSR v svyazi s zhalobami grazhdan V.M. Kul'neeva, V.S. Lalueva, Yu.V. Lukasheva i I.P. Serebryannikova» // Vestnik Konstitucionnogo Suda RF. 1996. № 2. S. 24.
4. Kalinkina L.D. Suschestvennye narusheniya ugolovno-processual'nogo zakona i ih pravovye posledstviya. Saransk: Mordovskoe knizhnoe izd-vo, 2007.
5. Kalinkina L.D. Narusheniya ugolovno-processual'nogo zakona i ih pravovye posledstviya. Saransk, 1993. S. 52, 53.
